Sorry, but like I said I take NEITHER side at face value, and I don’t care if your last name is Kennedy or Smith, 10k a month is indeed enough to where you should not be needing food stamps to eat.
Guy could be a complete jackass, and if he is, the courts will rectify it in time. However, if there truly is that kind of money monthly around, there is no excuse for needing food stamps to feed the kids.
I trust absolutely NOTHING when it comes to anything related to family law, nothing. I’ve seen women screwed by their husbands, and understand why women nearly instantly sympathize with any woman in the situation, and I’ve seen men absolutely destroyed by their ex wives. Family law is not meant, or capable of being fair, its basically a legal avenue for people to pursue vendettas and can do so for the rest of their lives if they choose to.
You think TORT law is bad, pray you never get involved in the family court system.
Admittedly, you can’t see this from any lens other than your own, and I probably can’t because I’ve never gone through a divorce. But if you read the wording again, it does not say he GIVES $10,000 a month to her, it says he “pays” it. She has no income and no access to money so even if she was living in a $50,000 mansion, if he is paying that mortgage instead of giving her the cash, she still doesn’t have money to feed and clothe her children.