ORIGINAL PDF:
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/pdf/infections-spread-by-air-or-droplets.pdf
Posted on 10/29/2014 11:35:53 AM PDT by varyouga
CDC Poster Admits Ebola Can Be Spread Through Air And Contact of Contaminated Objects
I wanted to save and post here before it gets "corrected"
This is the same old information, droplets versus “airborne”.
I don’t understand this, they say it has to be in droplets but then they say it isn’t spread through the air but from what I read they said it can survive up to 6 days outside the body, that it doesn’t need to be in droplets so isn’t that “airborne”? Well I guess we’ll find out after the election when the ball drops and we get the real number how many are infected, after all as we have seen with Benghazi, Democraps getting elected is more important.
This has always been the case with CDC print materials. They always define “close contact” as “within a meter”.
Publicly, they say things a little differently.
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/pdf/preventings-stigma-low-literacy.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/pdf/when-someone-dies-in-the-home.pdf
Droplets, like those aerosoled out from the flushing of a toilet.
The toilet may be the Achilles Heel to to the safety of humanity.
Tell me again how airborne spread and droplet spread are not the same thing.
What lawyer is telling us that it depends on the meaning of the word “IS”.
The sective release of propaganda as new “information” would be hilarious if not for the deadly nature of thsi disease.
We can laugh at the buffoonery of the regime but if this spirals out of control it may well be the trigger Obamatullah is lusting for so he can use his pen and his phone and activate every E.O. that is designed seize total control of every activity and every life.
Gee, I sure hope not. Of course outside of the Bible, secular hope is cheap, we can indulge ourselves as much as we like.
Lies! All lies! The real danger is in sugary soft drinks and grade school lunches.
A link to this thread has been posted on the Ebola Surveillance Thread
They say it cannot be spread through food- well, this is nuanced, I thought the initial case came from someone getting, cooking, and eating a fruit bat? Maybe you can’t get it by eating cooked food, but you can get it by preparing contaminated food.
I don’t think they have proven whether or not you can get it by eating food or drinking water.
“Chickpox”?
“Airborn” sounds scarier than “droplet spread”.
They are wound up in Semantics of terms. In the first paragraph they admit YES! Ebola can be airborne. In the last paragraph they say NO, Ebola is not airborne. Common sense tells one to err on the side of caution.
I find it interesting that they think it appropriate to use ‘baby words’ for bodily functions, like Pee and Poop. Do they think no Americans know what urine is or what defecation is? Or maybe the words are too hard to pronounce?
I no longer have any respect or trust in this group.
*mark for pdf snag*
But, but we’ve had freepers (who work in LABS!) tell us that’s not true.
I’ve read your responses, Smokin’ Joe so this non-scientist (me) believes you.
Oh wait...
Bushmeat, anyone?
So what happens when one of these planes hauling ebola infected people to the USA, “crashes” in a popluation dense area?
I put crashs in quotes because the world apparently can’t even keep track of jumbo jets, and I wouldn’t put it past some in our government making something like this happen. Why would they do it?
If an Ebola flight “crashed” in a populated area, city or wherever, it would be easy enough to declare marshal law.
There is no Earthly reason to bring them here and there is a possibility that one of those flights could crash over populated area.
So again, why are we bringing them here?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.