[AppyPappy]

The amazing thing is that a woman is allowed to put any name she desires on a legal document without fear of the law. She never has to provide any evidence that she is telling the truth nor does it matter in the eyes of the law.

I have a friend who is listed on his ex-wife’s daughter’s birth certificate even though he was in a same-sex relationship at the time. He didn’t want the girl to grow up thinking she was the by-product of a one night stand.

[Ted Grant]

I’m fine with the presumption that a woman’s husband is the father of a child, and the presumption that the name on the birth certificate is the father of a child. It should be a rebuttable presumption, though: the father can challenge and provide evidence and proof that he is not the father. Easy enough.

[skinkinthegrass]

"The amazing thing is that a woman is allowed to put any name she desires on a legal document without fear of the law.
She never has to provide any evidence that she is telling the truth nor does it matter in the eyes of the law."so much truth, makes one faith in commitment/marriage, a farce. 😦
it seems, our parents "had it right" in the era of Jerry Springer.
marriage; then the kids, not before..to hell w/nature.