Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Anyone who baccedes to or buys property subject to a HOA deserves what he gets. His “ownership” is even more ephemeral than it is given the various federal and state taxes and forfeiture and eminent domain laws. An “owner” has bought limited rights to occupy and pay taxes on a piece of property until a politician or the police or some other bureaucratic agency decide they have some other use for it that will bring mor money to the government or to certain pockets.


2 posted on 10/28/2014 11:15:15 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus

A person who buys a property should not have to join the HOA, it should be a choice.


29 posted on 10/28/2014 12:09:05 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: arthurus
"Anyone who baccedes to or buys property subject to a HOA deserves what he gets"

Much of CO on the Rockies is a patchwork of developments with HOAs. Apparently, most of the original subdividers or their buyers were talked into establishing HOAs. Some of the developments with HOAs remain nearly empty after having been established about 40 years ago.

Imagine nearly all of the smaller private land lots of a whole country being subject to HOAs with no choice at all for buyers. It could happen. We might already be close to seeing that.

Avoidance is not the answer. The matter must and will be confronted. HOAs are de facto governments.


73 posted on 10/28/2014 2:42:57 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson