Lots of fancy titles to decide what they should say to the people.
We’ll lose track of them if we close the border, as if they will not rush to the local ethnic enclave anyway and bury themselves there for good.
It’s not based on science, for all you dummies who never went beyond dissecting frogs.
It’s bad for the economies of these nations, similar to the pro-choicers’ argument that to have the baby is inconvenient.
It’s not airborne (neglecting to mention that it’s transmissible by droplet, like from a flushing toile0t and many other ways).
And most ludicrous of all, no more health workers will want to go there if we stop commercial flights, as if the United States were not capable of providing transport for these workers.
Anything else?
Also, NYC is sounding real competent, with pictures of Bellevue in the paper showing a thousand lighted window, while the capacity in the ebola ward is 16.
I really don’t like the self-righteousness of those who are “less hysterical than thou.”
They seem determined to get this epidemic going.
There's word that Bellevue had to transfer its ICU patients to another hospital...