Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

“and only 1 federal judge said “yes”.

And that Federal judge was a sodomite. But the US Supreme Court saw nothing wrong with a sodomite judge ruling in a case concerning sodomy. That sir is the problem. These robed tyrants take care of each other. They could have heard the case, then ruled the judge should have recused himself him, then reinstated the will of the people. But they sided with tyranny, because that’s what they’re good at.


9 posted on 10/26/2014 7:34:03 AM PDT by NKP_Vet ("PRO FIDE, PRO UTILITATE HOMINUM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: NKP_Vet

Yet the important thing is that chart of the states, to show beyond any doubt how few people it took to inflict an unpopular and unwanted law on everyone.

All told, maybe a few thousand people, out of 330,000,000, got what they wanted, and everybody else didn’t matter one bit. Even the public who want homosexual marriage didn’t get a say in the matter, because of these few thousand peoples’ arrogance.

And that is how the issue should be presented to the people.


13 posted on 10/26/2014 7:53:17 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson