You seem conflicted, first you want to see him saying he was pro-choice since 1963, and then you dive into defending him being so, just in case, you mention when Mitt was 30, at 30 his religion still excluded blacks from full membership (for instance the draft evasion that Mitt used), and he was still a few years from becoming a church Bishop.
In this video you will first hear him give his mother’s Senate campaign as when he firmed up his pro choice views, but a few seconds later, he traces it back to 1963 for his entire family, that is the mention of the infamous “family friend” of 1963.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeQGObiGGqY
The family friend was Ann Keenan the sister of Romney’s brother-in-law and died at the age of 21 in 1963.
In that video, Romney is running for the Senate and creeping up on his 50s, and had done fundraising for Planned Parenthood that same year.
I am not conflicted, and was not defending him. I simply stated that people change their views on issues from the time they”re in their teens till their older, like I have on many issues. That is not a defense of Romney. It was a defense of common sense. And this is all I was asking for to begin with was proof, thank you. I don’t know why getting proof is like pulling teeth. I had not seen this stuff before.