Norm, you were trying to pretend something else, rather than a meaningless mention of an endorsement 24 hours before the voting, you were trying to give the impression that Palin had been praised for her Romney support and endorsement. “”They praised her for endorsing Romney, the arch liberal.””
In post 99, you even explained why you were trying to mislead people.
A correction of pointing out that Palin only endorsed 24 hours before election day should have been a simple correction, but instead you just can’t accept it and move on, you have to continue with trying to justify or deny what you were doing.
Ansel, stick with trying to convince Freepers that their grandparents didn’t get married as young as they actually did. Because you aren’t convincing anyone that can read what I wrote.
I know, I know. It’s personal. That’s your problem. If you stuck to facts instead of whatever you call what you do, none of these tender moments we share would waste everyone’s time.