Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: logi_cal869

There appears to be 2 soldiers guarding the Tomb. I’d bet they weren’t allowed to have their long guns with bullets. Otherwise soldier #2 would have killed the gunman after he shot soldier # 1.


4 posted on 10/22/2014 11:12:23 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Undecided 2012

Bingo!


5 posted on 10/22/2014 11:24:16 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Undecided 2012

“I’d bet they weren’t allowed to have their long guns with bullets. Otherwise soldier #2 would have killed the gunman after he shot soldier # 1.”

From what I’ve heard & read, their guns were “ceremonial”, and they didn’t have bullets in them. The officer who was killed was a veteran, and I assume the other one was too, so they would have been trained to handle guns WITH bullets.

What I’ve wondered, considering Canada’s anti-gun laws and that the Sargent-at-Arms is an honorary position, why did he have a gun WITH bullets? Is that customary? His training and years of experience certainly came to the rescue yesterday. He is deservedly IMO being called a “hero”.


17 posted on 10/23/2014 6:25:44 AM PDT by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson