Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House shrugs off Obama remarks
The Hill ^ | October 21, 2014 | Justin Sink

Posted on 10/21/2014 9:12:17 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

The White House is shrugging off President Obama’s latest remarks tying Democratic candidates to his record, saying Obama was only trying to help motivate black voters to come to the polls.

Obama, in a Monday interview on the Rev. Al Sharpton’s radio show, said Democrats under fire on the campaign trail “vote with me” and “have supported my agenda in Congress.”

The comments were surprising given the efforts Democratic candidates, particularly in red states like Arkansas, Alaska and Louisiana, have made to distance themselves from the unpopular president.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Obama was just trying to make the point to Sharpton that his listeners should transfer their support for Obama to other Democratic candidates.

“The point the president made is, he’s looking for partners in Congress who are supportive of minimum wage, supportive of laws than ensure women get equal pay for equal work … these are the kind of policies Democrats in Congress have stepped up to the plate to support,” Earnest said.

“They don’t support them because the president supports them, they support them because they’re the right thing to do, and the president is pleased to have partners in Congress who are willing to work with him to make progress on those issues,” he said.

Obama’s comments on Sharpton’s show represent the second time in recent weeks that he’s tied Democratic candidates to his policies, something his former political adviser David Axelrod labeled a mistake.

Obama told Sharpton it was difficult for some red-state Democrats to appear with him “because the Republicans will use that to try to fan Republican turnout.”

“The bottom line is though, these are all folks who vote with me, they have supported my agenda in Congress, they are on the right side of minimum wage, they are on the right side of fair pay, they are on the right side of rebuilding our infrastructure, they’re on the right side of early childhood education,” Obama continued.

Republicans immediately pounced on the remark, saying it reinforced their contention that Democratic candidates in states like Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina, Kentucky and Alaska would simply enable the president’s agenda.

The GOP needs to gain six seats in the midterm elections in two weeks to take over the Senate.

The White House has undertaken a concerted effort to drive minority voters to the polls, with the president sitting for interviews with Sharpton along with radio hosts Steve Harvey, Rickey Smiley, Russ Parr and Yolanda Adams.

The president and first lady have also taped at least a dozen robocalls and radio ads that can air for Democratic candidates in urban areas without providing Republican candidates a visual of the president embracing their opponent, which could be used for attack ads.

Democratic strategists say that turning out minority voters in cities like New Orleans, Atlanta and Charlotte, N.C., will be crucial to any hopes for the party of retaining the Senate. In a memo obtained by The New York Times over the weekend, a former pollster for the president predicted “crushing Democratic losses across the country,” if Democrats did not do more to turn out the black vote.

“African-American surge voters came out in force in 2008 and 2012, but they are not well positioned to do so again in 2014,” wrote pollster Cornell Belcher in the memo. “In fact, over half aren’t even sure when the midterm elections are taking place.”

Earnest echoed that point on MSNBC.

“Democrats in a lot of these states are going to be counting on Hispanics, African-Americans, young people, young women in particular to turn out in the midterm elections — the president has gotten them to turn out in 2008 and 2012,” Earnest said.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2014election; obamacorrupt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife; John Semmens
The White House is shrugging off President Obama’s latest remarks tying Democratic candidates to his record, saying Obama was only trying to help motivate black voters to come to the polls.

This reads like something written by John Semmens in his satire pieces. John, maybe you can use this.

21 posted on 10/21/2014 10:22:54 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; John Semmens
The White House is shrugging off President Obama’s latest remarks tying Democratic candidates to his record

"The White House denies ANYTHING the President has said! The President IN NO WAY speaks for the White House in any manner whatsoever!"

John, your next topic awaits.

22 posted on 10/21/2014 10:25:59 AM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them. We have no 'news media', only a Soviet Pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon
Well, it makes a little more sense when you realize that the White House is Valerie Jarrett, and the President is Barack Obama.

So they are actually two distinct people.

23 posted on 10/21/2014 10:27:30 AM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them. We have no 'news media', only a Soviet Pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Even 0bammys nose-mole has switched sides.


24 posted on 10/21/2014 10:46:29 AM PDT by 867V309 (Crusade: the only solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The democrat voters will drink Obama’s vomit from buckets and feel that they have been blessed.


25 posted on 10/21/2014 10:49:43 AM PDT by Gator113 ( Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin and Mike Lee speak for me, most everyone else is just noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Good afternoon.

Josh should have said, “come on, you peasants know he was pandering to his sycophants. Sheesh.”

5.56mm


26 posted on 10/21/2014 10:52:59 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

“It’s not like he really meant it or anything”...


27 posted on 10/21/2014 11:07:05 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

So their explanation is that he was “only” making a racist appeal for votes based on skin color?

Unbelievable.


28 posted on 10/21/2014 11:08:55 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

While these candidates are out their lying about their records. Obama is keeping them honest! Way to go! LOL!


29 posted on 10/21/2014 11:09:35 AM PDT by CityCenter (Resist Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Obama speaks ? Every time I see him his mouth is moving but I hear nothing


30 posted on 10/21/2014 11:37:33 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Here’s the thing: Most LIVs don’t understand how our government works. They haven’t a clue about the duties and responsibilities of each elected office and think the president has total say so over what happens in this country. Come to think of it - under obama -this might be true.


31 posted on 10/21/2014 11:59:39 AM PDT by Catsrus (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

32 posted on 10/21/2014 5:34:34 PM PDT by Manic_Episode (GOP = The Whig Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
“The bottom line is though, these are all folks who vote with me, they have supported my agenda in Congress, they are on the right side of minimum wage, they are on the right side of fair pay, they are on the right side of rebuilding our infrastructure, they’re on the right side of early childhood education,”...hmmm - well, he really can't be that stupid that he thinks such comments won't hurt 'rats in the upcoming elections, or so arrogant that he believes his own popularity, which is virtually nil, would transfer to those 'rats through such comments - no, right now he is a failed president who knows he will get nothing of substance accomplished in the next two years - so why not go for a Republican victory in the Senate, so that the rest of his term he can build the myth that everything that goes wrong and every failure of his administration is the result of evil Republicans thwarting his noble efforts - everything is about Obama, and now it's time to throw his party under the bus to try to save something of his legacy - just maybe he wants the Republicans to win......
33 posted on 10/21/2014 5:43:58 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

What can we do?

At that point, if the politicians on the right (as in Constitutional) side of the isue do nothing, then armed revolution is the only option.


34 posted on 10/22/2014 11:49:30 AM PDT by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson