I'm a senior data analyst working with Big Data.
I think if you exam your life you’ll see some of the tradeoffs you made as a result of being a pothead.
As I already told you when you first attempted to redirect from issues to personalities, I haven't smoked pot in decades.
You can see too in your own snarky, solipsistic, and smug persistent posts
Adjectives still aren't rebuttals. But that last one, "persistent," reveals your real beef: I slap down all the nonsense you post.
And finally getting back to one of the issues you're struggling to evade: if, as you falsely suppose, I were a "pothead" who had made tradeoffs in his own life, how is that any of your or government's business?
Using your logic, we’d not enforce any laws. After all, people break laws. You say you used to break the pot laws. You say that kids break them now. You say it’s a good thing that pot is stronger since people can get stoned faster. People often speed while driving. Would you favor not enforcing those laws? People break other drug laws. Would you favor legalizing all dope? People routinely break those laws. Using your logic, it’s not any else’s business. How about driving while stoned on pot? Is that okay? In your view, the republican values and virtues of sobriety and good health needed for self-government are trumped by the dippy pro-pot views of the 1960’s. Addiction, and its increase in the last thirty years, is a social problem that is the self-evident trade off for libertine and lawless approaches to all drugs. You just believe the enforcement of the laws is worse than allowing legal dope use. Yet you don’t even acknowledge there is a self-evident trade off. Instead, you copy and paste everthing written as if your trite old arguments are somehow novel and profound.
“And finally getting back to one of the issues you’re struggling to evade: if, as you falsely suppose, I were a “pothead” who had made tradeoffs in his own life, how is that any of your or government’s business?”
I’m going to thumbnail this for you. You’re probably going to want to copy and save this.
I’m the kind of conservative that believes that anything I disagree with should be against the law.
The reason I believe this is because I know everything. I know that I know I know everything by how strongly I feel about it.
For instance. All New York Yankee fans should be jailed. I hate the Yankees. I’m sure god will punish them in the hereafter but until then I think stiff prison terms are in order.
Another way that I know I’m always right is that I never ...ever change my mind about anything. It doesn’t matter to me what scientific proof you have or what some egg head professor somewhere says in a long term scientific study.
After I “Just Know” something, that’s it. It’s known then.
When I was 4 years old my great grandmother told me you make a snake by putting the hair from a horses tail in a pan of water. She got some horsehair and tried it. When she’d shake the pan the hair would serpentine in the water. She told me it was a snake.
That’s how I know snakes come from horses shedding tail hair in water.
I don’t care what some biologists says my great grandmother told me the truth.
As a conservative I hate big government. Unless big government is busting balls on something I disagree with. Then it’s OK.
I hope this cleared up why I’m right and your wrong>
You may want to try watching the documentary “Reefer Madness” it’s all right there.
AND YES THIS IS SNARK.
See my user name.