I’m not arguing alphabet, or party, although parties have a platform, and on any particular day elected officials may stray from the platform, I think we are off in the weeds now.
People make a choice in an election and choices have consequences. I believe that is the argument. Justification of choice whether principle or conscience is where I told you I got bogged down on definition, just like defining liberal R vesus conservative. Pick a day pick a minute the definition can change.
Maybe it is simply a matter of attempting to blame someone for the pickle we are in. The bottom line is we better be able to unite before the other side, united on principle or lack of, unites us into oblivion.
Not sure if I hit all your questions, but I have to run help someone with a serious Social Security problem so I’ll check later.
There is blame to be placed isn’t there? Someone is responsible for putting the RINOs in office who sided with Obama to keep the borders open and import the diseased illegals. The RNIOs themselves did in fact side with Obama to keep the borders open and facilitate the importation of those diseased illegals didn’t they?
The base screamed loudly they did not want the open borders that resulted in this. They were ignored by the pols and the sycophants made a million excuses as to why we HAD to elect more of those very people because ‘winning’ was everything and the ‘winner’ had to have an R attached regardless of what they stood for.
That happened. It can be read across the net in tens of thousands of articles and millions of blog/forum posts.
Is not the entire concept of justice/right/wrong to place blame, assign consequences and prevent the problem from reoccurring?
Until we put blame where it belongs, we will keep mistaking ourselves into Soviet Russia.