Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Second Amendment First

Yeah, but just because he had them at the time the picture was taken doesn’t mean he had one when the confrontation with the officer occurred. Even if it’s the same model. Nobody can say whether the serial number of that common gun matched the one in the picture.

And just because he might have had that gun when the confrontation occurred doesn’t mean he really pointed the gun at the officer.

And just because he might have had that gun when the confrontation occurred and pointed the gun at the officer doesn’t mean the gun was loaded.

And just because he might have had that gun when the confrontation occurred and pointed the gun at the officer and even if the gun was loaded doesn’t mean he actually shot the gun.

And just because he might have had that gun and pointed the gun at the officer and even if the gun was loaded doesn’t mean he actually aimed at the officer.

And even if all that is true doesn’t mean he was a good enough shot for the officer to be concerned for his life.

And even if he had the gun, loaded, pointed it at the officer, and fired, multiple times doesn’t mean you’re not a racist.


30 posted on 10/14/2014 12:01:32 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Attention Surplus Disorder

And don’t forget. Once the gun jammed, he was unarmed. Helpless.


36 posted on 10/14/2014 12:29:56 PM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson