I think the problem with Mark is assuming his audience has the same intelligence and thought processes as liberals and needs to be talked to in the same way. Hence, the south bad, the north good and just believe every thing I say.
He shut that caller down on Dred Scott without listening to anything he had to say and didn’t want to hear anything he said. Mark is wrong about Dred Scott. The court decided correctly and I will argue that. What it did demonstrate was the necessity of having the ability to amend the Constitution. That was the proper way to correct a legally proper but morally improper decision. Did Dred Scott really start the Civil War because there was no recourse to a court decision? If that is the justification for the “Liberty Amendments”, it is nothing more than fear mongering to which I say no thanks.
Agreed