[Gen.Blather]

Politically unacceptable words are defined contextually. They’re only unacceptable if one of the non-cognoscenti use them. If you’re with the “in” crowd anything you say is automatically approved. Not knowing this is sexist and anti-woman.

[SampleMan]

They should just put on their big-boy pants and be quiet.

Seriously, no on is stopping them from saying whatever they want to. They are free to “put on big-girl dresses”, “act like a woman”, “Fem up”, “Grow a pair of boobs”, “Act like they've got a pair of boobs”, etc.

Curiously, these feminists identify testosterone for male aggressiveness, but then get their panties in a wad (see what I did there) when the language reflects that view.

[DemforBush]

All of this paid for with taxpayer monies, no less.

[exDemMom]

I seem to recall that about a decade ago, the big feminist empowerment schtick was something called the “V_____ monologues”, which reduced women to nothing more than ambulatory genitals.

I also remember the bra-burning of the late 1960s/early 1970s, which was supposed to demonstrate that women are not sex objects.

“Feminists” are all over the place on this.

[righttackle44]

Oh, man. What are we going to do about this, guys? If we don’t stand up and man up, the feminists are going to leave the planet or something.

[T-Bone Texan]

CELBRATE BOSSY !

[july4thfreedomfoundation]

“How to be a Gentleman and Get Laid?”

“Negotiating Successful Threesomes”?

“BJs and Beyond?”

This from a so-called Women’s Resource Center at the University of New Mexico?

It sounds like a workshop for whores. And these “women” wonder why men don’t take them seriously.

[CatherineofAragon]

" a “feminist model of empowerment,”

Empowerment-definition: To give power or authority to.

If these battleaxes are so independent, why don't they take their authority? Why are they always looking for someone to GIVE it to them?

[ShadowAce]

...and “BJs and Beyond.”

Sounds like a mall:

[Kodos the Executioner]

try this on for size, ladies.....

BIT@H PLEASE...

[a fool in paradise]

The center, which claims to be based on a “feminist model of empowerment,” insisted the workshops would “help prevent sexual assault” — even though their descriptions actually used the same kind of language that feminist activists have been claiming causes sexual assault. The “Negotiating Successful Threesomes” workshop, for example, promises to teach students to “negotiate boundaries . . . to make your next menage a trios tré bien! [sic].” “Negotiate boundaries?” Wait, doesn’t that sound like “rape culture”? I thought sexual “boundaries” were whatever the woman says they are, and that any further discussion, questioning, or “negotiating” beyond that was unacceptable and contributed to a culture of pervasive sexual violence.

Negotiating "boundaries" means destroying the barriers established by "the Patriarchy" including concepts like MONOGAMY.

Radical feminism, pushing the same "smash the patriarchy, smash monogamy, smash the state" rhetoric they have since the glory days of late 60s US Communism.