Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

I must say that it is EXTRAORDINARILY RARE for judges in these cases to NOT award custody to the woman.


38 posted on 09/29/2014 10:22:28 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog
I must say that it is EXTRAORDINARILY RARE for judges in these cases to NOT award custody to the woman.

Which leads me to suspect that there might be something a little off about the author. Aside from her obviously faulty gay-dar.

54 posted on 09/29/2014 10:31:52 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog
I must say that it is EXTRAORDINARILY RARE for judges in these cases to NOT award custody to the woman.

Based on what? Can you give a citation with accurate statistics? Judges can do anything they want. In big cities, you will find specialty law firms to handle divorce cases involving professional men who are wealthy and will do anything to destroy their former wives so they can take the children and go off with their new partner, whether male or female. Is this because they want the children? Often, no. They just want to reduce the amount of child support they must pay; or they want to destroy the ex because she is the proof of their betrayal and guilt.

The article says her ex and his gay partner both make more money than she does. It wouldn't surprise me if he were a lawyer, doctor, executive or accountant.

121 posted on 09/29/2014 12:25:16 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (S.I.N. = Systematic Inversion of Norms)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson