Do you have a rational way to rebuke what I wrote?
Don’t the queers at some point have to make a rational argument for their case?
“Don’t the queers at some point have to make a rational argument for their case?”
Not as far as the state is concerned. All that concerns the state in the modern era is simply whatever judges, pols, or the voting majority think about their irrational marriage argument at any one time. That’s how the state defines marriage, it doesn’t have any other way to do it as far as I can see. To the state marriage can be anything as long as judges, pols, or the majority say it can, rationality only comes into as far as judges, pols, or the majority care about such things.
Freegards