[Forward the Light Brigade]

Why not?—Its an American tradition—if you are cheated in an election—wait four years and try again—Reagon was cheated in 1976 ran in 80 and won. Even Andy Jackson was cheated and ran again to win and find greatness. Other examples exist. He should at least try—if the GOP thinks he wouldn’t be a great president—let them at least have Mitt as a choice in the primary. Ted Cruz—great man—too inexperienced, Sarah Palin, Too Toxic (thank you Tina Fey) Rick Perry ? Newt ? Walker Maybe.

[Waryone]

Mitt Romney too liberal. He hates running against liberals. Since I doubt the dems will be running any conservatives any time soon, if Mitt somehow manages to win the republican nomination again, the result will be the same. He’ll lose. He won’t try to beat Hillary or Fauxcahontas. They are his fellow libs.

[SoConPubbie]

Ted Cruz—great man—too inexperienced

1. So, how is Mitt Romney more experienced than Ted Cruz?
2. And how does your definition of "experience" trump the distinct and vast differences that exist between the two men in terms of honor, policy positions, and past history?

[fieldmarshaldj]

Ted Cruz has been baptized by fire. He is infinitely more qualified and experienced than the current occupant.