[YHAOS]

You've named 12, past and present.

As our FRiend, marron, observes, any number I cite, will not be “many.” If I provided twenty, you would demand thirty more; and if I complied, you would demand fifty more; ad infinitum.

And through the fog of your numbers game, you continue to attempt to evade the issue by changing the subject. The issue is the abuse of Science by Liberals to malign Conservatives, Libertarians, and others such as myself, in an attempt to shut us up. Isn’t going to happen my FRiend, despite your best efforts.

Thanks FRiend marron, for your timely insight.

[tacticalogic]

As our FRiend, marron, observes, any number I cite, will not be “many.”

Conversely, you could consider and cite virtually any number as being "many".

And through the fog of your numbers game, you continue to attempt to evade the issue by changing the subject. The issue is the abuse of Science by Liberals to malign Conservatives, Libertarians, and others such as myself, in an attempt to shut us up. Isn’t going to happen my FRiend, despite your best efforts.

Nobody's trying to "shut you up". All I ask for was for a subjective and potentially ambiguous term to be clarified

If that's the issue, then the blame is being misdirected. It is not the fault of science that people abuse it.