[fishtank]

ICR article image.

[I want the USA back]

Science doesn’t have all the answers.

[Citizen Zed]

Crazy. I read once that a strawberry has more genetic matter as a percent of its weight than most living things. I wonder if we’ll find a message from God in there someday?

[JimSEA]

Just reacting to your headline and common practice at ICR, the fact that science hasn’t got an explaination for something doesn’t “prove” the existence of God or intelligent design. To argue otherwise is a classic non sequitur. It just means we haven’t figured something out yet.

[VanShuyten]

Ciliate Protozoa have had just as much time to evolve as humans and strawberries. Why shouldn’t their genome be as complex as ours?

[betty boop]

Clearly the concepts of intricate genome rearrangements on a massive scale combined with complex encryption systems do not bode well for something allegedly derived by the random chance processes of evolution.

Ergo, Darwin's theory is basically just a myth....

A theory that requires speciation to be a process of moving from the simple to the complex, by means of a random chance process, is utterly undermined by the accumulating evidence that all biological life is mind-bogglingly complex, even the so-called "simple" living systems.

Thanks for posting, fishtank.

[ctdonath2]

Great complexity can emerge from profound simplicity.

emerged from

z = z^2 + c

Just because what you perceive is befuddling doesn't mean it invalidates the theory of a simple natural explanation, and in turn does not prove or disprove God's involvement.