I note they do not feel the need to list the self-evident percentage of females.
It's only a rich or especially degenerate social order that perceives the luxury of bogging down under, so-called, "gender bias" that would worry about unnecessary silliness respecting how many patients are are among all the self-styled and subjective gender categories.
Under the stresses of genuine warfare, where survival is the issue, people come out from under their adopted "perceptions" and get down quickly to some reality, or they simply don't survive the crisis.
That 49.5% number is interesting. In these cultures the women are responsible for caring for the ill, so you expect to see more women infected than men simply due to greater exposure to infectious fluids. That it’s now evenly distributed between males and females says something about the nature of this outbreak but I’m not sure precisely what.
Thanks for the heads-up.