Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN

Sure, seals and gaskets are replaceable.

But rebuilding incurs downtime and costs money. (Can you say “parts AND labor”? There! I thought you could.)

Isn’t it smarter to AVOID the need to replace seals and gaskets by burning fuel that doesn’t damage them?

Especially when there is ZERO benefit of ANY kind to burning the DUMB fuel. It’s not cheaper, it’s not safer, it’s not higher energy density, it doesn’t keep longer...)

Just sayin’.


58 posted on 09/22/2014 11:14:55 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Nervous Tick

Please, my preference is to go directly to hydrogen fuel. Ethanol for fuel is, well, depriving animals who make wonderful dishes on the table.


60 posted on 09/22/2014 11:20:27 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson