[Pollster1]

In an 8-1 ruling, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals said photos, like paintings, films and books, are "inherently expressive" and, therefore, are protected by the First Amendment.

I hope they will also rule that a father's/husband's/brother's fists or the girl's knee/elbow/fist/foot in response to this intrusion on privacy are also "inherently expressive". It's Texas, so they should see my point.

[Navy Patriot]

I hope they will also rule that a father's/husband's/brother's fists or the girl's knee/elbow/fist/foot in response to this intrusion on privacy are also "inherently expressive".

There was more wisdom in the old days when "Gentleman" did not necessarily mean gentle, but did mean proper.