Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tflabo
OK-lets follow your line of reasoning and say we took out Saddam in the first Gulf war. So he was replaced earlier lets just say. You trust the PC run US Govt to come up with a good plan to replace Saddam? I posit that we would be singing the same tune regardless if Saddam got booted by Sr or Jr Bush

That may very well be true. Which points why in the end, it was very short-sighted to go in.

Why should we have given a rip about Kuwait anyway. It was historically a part of Iraq, it was a gift to the oil companies, courtesy of British map-makers. Just a bunch of Arabs anyway, and they were no saints, either. They hired a PR firm to make up stories, like the one about the Iraqis stealing incubators. And they were side-drilling into Iraqi oil fields.

69 posted on 09/18/2014 9:36:31 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

We were then hooked on ME oil and our allies too. If Saddam later on went in and blocked the Persian Gulf that would have been a war just as well. The less we have to deal with those whack job muzzie Arabs the better. Those fat Saudi Arabs are corrupt backstabbers anyway. They use their oil wealth to help fund muzzie terrorists against the west.
Why don’t those fat sheiks help their lesser, poorer muzzie brethren in the sandrat hellholes? Answer—they are selfish fat bastard backstabbers secretly doing dirty deeds and don’t give a rip about them except to exploit them.


75 posted on 09/18/2014 10:07:18 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson