[wetphoenix]

I’m not backing any of the above and not spreading any propaganda, but it is all about lesser evil.
You can’t remove Assad and expect any better regime and Iranian regime is surely a problem but it requires specific solutions to deal with it, which is a subversion in the first place, not a military op.

[cripplecreek]

Iranian regime is surely a problem but it requires specific solutions to deal with it, which is a subversion in the first place, not a military op.

Unfortunately when there was a chance to overthrow the twelver nutjobs a few years ago, Obama didn't even offer a few words of support. Contrast that with his multi jumbotron speech broadcast to crowds in Cairo which brought the muslim brotherhood to power.

[Olog-hai]

There is no “lesser evil” there.

And of course you can’t remove one Islamic regime only to replace it with another while expecting better results—Iraq is the prime example. The liberals in DC either do not understand what victory is against Islam or do not care; I believe the latter.

Get one thing straight: being against Assad is not being pro-IS(IS/IL). The devil you think you know is the same as the devil you don’t know.