Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/13/2014 3:56:31 PM PDT by MikeJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MikeJ

Nothing to see here... Move along.


2 posted on 09/13/2014 3:59:52 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Manchuria Called. They want their Candidate Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeJ

Obama is allied with these people. He is a Muslim extremist. All the evidence is clear.


3 posted on 09/13/2014 4:11:16 PM PDT by Viennacon (ILLEGALS ARE VIRAL WEAPONS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeJ

More overseas contingency operations I see...


4 posted on 09/13/2014 4:12:20 PM PDT by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeJ

More overseas contingency operations I see...


5 posted on 09/13/2014 4:12:20 PM PDT by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeJ

An islamic cell by any other name is still a terrorist organization.


6 posted on 09/13/2014 4:48:22 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeJ

Is these the “rebels” Obama will be training for the next couple of years to defeat the Islamics that are not Islamics that are in ISIS?


7 posted on 09/13/2014 5:27:04 PM PDT by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeJ
Here's a solution let Assad kill them all.
8 posted on 09/13/2014 5:29:44 PM PDT by McGruff (I'm thinkin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeJ
I guess I look at all of this the same way I would look at a treating a bacterial infection. Bacterial infections can and do kill people frequently. Bacteria that become resistant to antibiotics are particularly deadly. That's why when treating a bacterial infection you want to be appropriately aggressive, and treat for an appropriately long period, so that you don't allow the survival of those bacteria who are developing resistance to the antibiotic you are using.

What we've done in the Middle East, IMHO, is the equivalent of stopping the antibiotic treatment before eradicating the infection. Those bacteria we didn't eradicate (the remnants of Al Queda, etc.) have developed resistance to the antibiotics (e.g. learned new strategies, such as how to insulate their funding sources from us, and likely new ways to avoid surveillance and counterterrorism measures) and are now causing a new infection (i.e. ISIS), and they are going to require new antibiotics and a more aggressive treatment to eradicate. If we can't produce better antibiotics, to which they are susceptible, they will continue to grow until they destroy us.

In short, by not finishing the job and providing lasting security to the world and the Middle East, we have allowed the enemy to develop resistance against our tactics, and have now made them more dangerous than they were before. Dealing with this will involve a more aggressive strategy than before, not a lessor strategy. Unfortunately, that's the truth, and the administration is not going to respond in this manner.

10 posted on 09/13/2014 7:05:50 PM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson