If the Clintons did it you’d be condemning them to hell .
If the Clintons did it you’d be condemning them to hell .
= = = = = = = = = = = =
Not many will disagree with you.
However, if it were the Clintons or Kennedys it would be filtered, making them look like fun loving people and it would be reported a couple of weeks after the event and after ‘they’ were backed into a corner.
Number one, don’t assume that you know how I’d react to hypothetical situations. That’s just plain arrogance. Number two, you’re under the impression that I like the Palins, or else dislike them intensely. I don’t care for them one way or another. I just think that we have more important things to focus on than stupid, petty, nonsense like this. Number three, even if it were the Clintons, (which I think they are too obsessed with their own consequence to do something like this) they wouldn’t deserve entire segments about a supposed brawl. This is why we’re screwed up as a country. Instead of talking about Benghazi, something actually having to do with a Clinton, or immigration, or voter fraud, or Common Core, or ISIS, or the other problems plaguing this country, the media decides to focus on increasing racial tensions with that punk Michael Brown, or something stupid the Palins may or may not have done. Christians are dying in the ME. We have diseases and terrorists crossing our borders. The world has gone insane, and the media has to hold a festival over dumb things like this. How much can you actually talk about it, anyways? If they mentioned it in passing, I could understand, but holding multiple entire hour-long programs to discuss something that probably lasted 5 minutes at the most? Seriously?
Gossip and rumors are not facts
If the Clintons did it you wouldnt know it even know it happened