Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too
I didn't think this was about naming a replacement. This was about dropping out so that he didn't split the Democrat vote against Roberts.

The statue requires that a replacement be named. Of course that completely ruins the Democrat plan, it depends on a blank line for the Democrat.

22 posted on 09/11/2014 4:49:26 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: centurion316

When the Kansas Supremes rule against one part of the statute, what’s to stop them from overruling the part that says a replacement must be named?

Right. Nothing.

Judges will make law, Democrats will get what they want and Republicans will, as usual, do nothing as long as they keep getting invited to the right cocktail parties.


47 posted on 09/12/2014 8:06:07 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson