The sexual revolution was part of a communist led political revolution. NOW admitted it at their founding. The Weather Underground have since come out about that too.
Free Love meant no refusal, someone wants sex from you, you submit. Free love wasn’t free.
“Smash monogamy”, “Smash the patriarchy”, “Smash the State”.
What else is in it for Planned Parenthood to be pushing the homosexual agenda? It certainly isn’t about family planning.
While searching for the Ayers (9-11-2001) article from the new york times, I ran across this excerpt (in pdf) from apparently a longer text. This chapter covers the ties between sex revolt and political revolt and carried the chapter title “Smash Monogamy”.
It’s about 22 pages and includes footnotes to sourced quotes.
http://web.calstatela.edu/centers/perspectives/vol39/Smash%20Monogamy.pdf
Ayers, of course, has been accused of rape. By a young woman - many years ago now.
...
In 1919, Georg Lukacs became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary. He immediately set plans in motion to de-Christianize Hungary. Reasoning that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the Church would be dealt a crippling blow. Lukacs launched a radical sex education program in the schools. Sex lectures were organized and literature handed out which graphically instructed youth in free love (promiscuity) and sexual intercourse while simultaneously encouraging them to deride and reject Christian moral ethics, monogamy, and parental and church authority. All of this was accompanied by a reign of cultural terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and dissenters.
Hungary’s youth, having been fed a steady diet of values-neutral (atheism) and radical sex education while simultaneously encouraged to rebel against all authority, easily turned into delinquents ranging from bullies and petty thieves to sex predators, murderers, and sociopaths.
...
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/02/cultural_marxism.html
Correct. The sexual revolution was never about sex, was all about revolution. Or, as David Horowitz has said the issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.
There was a great article posted here a few days back by the sister of one of the early NOW leaders. She recanted how, having going to many ofvthe early organizing meetings, her sister and the other NOW leaders were pretty much Maoists. It was who they were, they were proud of it and they built it into their organization and movement at a foundational level.