I don’t know what she thinks she can accomplish trying to reason with loons such as Churchill and Ayres.
Who’s next? Charlie Manson?
I know this is sacrilege to the GUYS to speak of Saint Ms Kelly in any other terms than ADORATION, and I know that I will, no doubt, be accused of jealousy, but she IS out to get ahead, just like the NOT-SO-gorgeous Greta van Sustren and ALL the other folks in the media, male and female alike.
I don’t believe Megan Kelly is trying to reason with the likes of Ayers and Churchill - she draws them out to spout their personal bias and leaves it exposed.
She reports on their prejudices, and you decide. And what the heck, maybe some of her audience had previously AGREED with Ward Churchill and Bill Ayers - until they heard them try to string together a logical position, neither one of whom is capable of in the least.
She's not trying to reason with them, she's giving them enough rope to hang themselves. Did you watch the Churchill interview? He came off looking far worse than I ever could have hoped. He was evasive to a cowardly extent (she called him on it over and over), vicious, evil, and so -- how do I say it? -- stupid that I wondered how such a lowbrow could ever become a faculty member at a major university.
Kelly's interview with Churchill can and will be used against him for years to come. It's quite a weapon. Same, by the way, with her interview with Bill Ayers. Normally I'd say let these people rot in obscurity, but of course they're not in obscurity, and Kelly eviscerates them.