Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenhouse gas levels rising at fastest rate since 1984 (according to new WMO figures)
BBC News ^ | 9/8/14 | Matt McGrath

Posted on 09/08/2014 7:17:03 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

A surge in atmospheric CO2 saw levels of greenhouse gases reach record levels in 2013, according to new figures.

Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 2012 and 2013 grew at their fastest rate since 1984.

The World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) says that it highlights the need for a global climate treaty.

But the UK's energy secretary Ed Davey said that any such agreement might not contain legally binding emissions cuts, as has been previously envisaged.

The WMO's annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin doesn't measure emissions from power station smokestacks but instead records how much of the warming gases remain in the atmosphere after the complex interactions that take place between the air, the land and the oceans.

About half of all emissions are taken up by the seas, trees and living things.

According to the bulletin, the globally averaged amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere reached 396 parts per million (ppm) in 2013, an increase of almost 3ppm over the previous year.

"The Greenhouse Gas Bulletin shows that, far from falling, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere actually increased last year at the fastest rate for nearly 30 years," said Michel Jarraud, secretary general of the WMO.

Atmospheric CO2 is now at 142% of the levels in 1750, before the start of the industrial revolution.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1984; fastest; greenhousegas; rising
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: SoFloFreeper

When in worry;
When in doubt;
Run in circles;
SCREAM and SHOUT!!


41 posted on 09/09/2014 5:00:06 AM PDT by Nuocmam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: urbanpovertylawcenter

Let’s keep the (BFA) bovine flatulence angle out of it. Thanks. ;-}


42 posted on 09/09/2014 8:49:04 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

When I was on ship, there were kick plates on the doors to the CO2 room. Reason for those is because if there was a CO2 leak, the CO2, which is heavier than O2, and H2O, would settle to the bottom of the space, and begin to ‘stack up’ until the level of it reached your mouth and nose, whereupon you’d pass out, and then die.

Seems to me, if you are measuring CO2 in the atmosphere, you’d be taking those measurements close to the ground.

It’s also for this reason that the ocean is able to absorb CO2. It’s used by oceanic plant life in photosynthesis.

Because the molecule is as heavy as it is, plants as short as moss use it to make their own food.

If it we breathed NO2, say, then there would be no, or little, plant life, since the CO2 would be stacked up on top of the NO2.

And what is worse, there is so little CO2 in the atmosphere that it doesn’t make any difference in terms of how much heat is held to their earth. Water vapor, by far, has more influence on how hot the planet is than CO2.


43 posted on 09/09/2014 9:00:21 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Oh yeah pretty toxic that Dihydrogen monoxide...


44 posted on 09/09/2014 9:08:46 AM PDT by Syncro (IMPEACH the Islamic Criminal Sex Trafficker Coyote-in Chief Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Yeah, well, there ain’t that much Carbonated Dioxide stuff for the liberals to worry their little empty heads about, neither!!!


45 posted on 09/09/2014 10:04:30 AM PDT by SierraWasp (Obama is mad! He's getting madder with each crisis and now he's a real MADMAN with no temper left!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

If they (the huggers) would have let Walter Munk measure ocean temperatures, we’d have definitive data on earth (ocean) temperatures.
Measuring the temp. of an insulating blanket at some altitude is bogus. Specially when the principle heat source is on the outside.
GRRRR


46 posted on 09/09/2014 4:59:30 PM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sasquatch

Man-O-Man! Ain’t that the truth!!!


47 posted on 09/10/2014 11:41:56 AM PDT by SierraWasp (Obama is mad! He's getting madder with each crisis and now he's a real MADMAN with no temper left!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson