Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oh8eleven; GulliverSwift; no-to-illegals; All

Perhaps, although hard to believe, it’s because Forbes is actually right about the current economy.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2014/09/05/obama-outperforms-reagan-on-jobs-growth-and-investing/


7 posted on 09/08/2014 2:46:00 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin
That article is full of it.

Of course, with many trillions of dollars being pushed into the economy each year under 0bama, these sorts of numbers made 0 look good.

Takes those numbers and divide them by per capita government debt and index the numbers to inflation, and you will see a HUGE difference to the negative.

Heck, even cutting the budget down to size would spark a big Dow correction (you mean the government isn't going to keep boosting the economy?).

We need to argue logic against these now perverted, formerly good, measuring sticks.

27 posted on 09/08/2014 3:19:04 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin

Ha ha...funny how they use the Bureau of Labor’s/Labor Depts (cooked) numbers, for this BS article.

Real unemployment numbers have yet to be used...by this admin, or by the MSM, since 0bola has taken office.

The only thing that’s saved 0’s overall economic numbers is all of the oil drilling (N Dakota) and the economies of red states, like Texas.


59 posted on 09/08/2014 8:04:16 PM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson