Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind

What if the sex actually transpired but between two parties equally inebriated? Why does it constitute rape on the part of the male but victimhood on the part of the female, even if it was mutually consensual? Why is the male adjudged fully competent (and hence, fully liable) while the female is held blameless due to her diminished capacity?


22 posted on 09/08/2014 10:23:43 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack
I would start that argument by saying both raped the other, but for us guys, we are the ones who cross into their bodies and leave a product that only proves we did what we did.

Sadly, we are also typically physically stronger.

The case would end with the man being guilty and the woman's guilt “not proven.”

It is kind of difficult for us to say we didn't at least have battery proven against us, if not rape.

In the end, we need to keep our privates, private and keep ourselves sober enough to be beyond reproach.

23 posted on 09/08/2014 10:32:40 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson