A majority can be accused of laziness, apathy, stupidity, of being ill informed.
But a majority clearly did not consent to the sort of leadership Obama has provided - Obama the candidate was completely different than Obama the president.
Please pardon if this sounds harsh, but Obama doesn't care what you consider consent. He won with a clear majority in the popular and electoral votes in both 2008 and 2012, and that gave him consent.
A majority can be accused of laziness, apathy, stupidity, of being ill informed.
So what do we have to do to inform them before 2016?
But a majority clearly did not consent to the sort of leadership Obama has provided - Obama the candidate was completely different than Obama the president.
A majority voted for him in 2012, after Obamacare was passed, after Benghazi, and after he told Medvedev he would have more leeway after the elections. The electorate knew all of this in 2012, but elected him anyway.