More sloppy media. They have since updated the article to say that he was sentenced in 1991 for murder and released in 2003 (which would be 11 years) but the title and article still claims that he spent 17 years in prison.
Also, the title only mentions that he's accused of taking the money... when in reality there was also a burglary.
To: Cementjungle
English taught at journalism school?
2 posted on
09/05/2014 10:11:20 AM PDT by
stormhill
To: Cementjungle
More sloppy media. They have since updated the article to say that he was sentenced in 1991 for murder and released in 2003 (which would be 11 years) but the title and article still claims that he spent 17 years in prison. Yeah? Well, nothing you say can be trusted, because you are in your pajamas, and never went to Journalism School, and have no one to "vet" you.
3 posted on
09/05/2014 10:16:51 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
To: Cementjungle
11 years sounds more reasonable for murder. He must have had a life sentence.
4 posted on
09/05/2014 10:32:45 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: Cementjungle
Kenricks was involved in a “botched” robbery that saw his friend get shot in the head? So apparently the targeted victim wasted Kendricks accomplice.
Note the way the urinalist tries to obscure how the mark took out one of his attackers.
5 posted on
09/05/2014 11:36:23 AM PDT by
Rockpile
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson