Would someone who was victimized by illegal aliens be an injured party and therefore have standing. . .meaning the Big Zero knowingly released illegal criminals, those with a history of, say drunk driving, and said drug driving illegal alien hurt someone while drunk driving again.
Would that provide some sort of cover?
That’s quite a stretch, but in court, anything is possible, just not probable.
If NO illegal aliens were being apprehended and deported, then yeah, I think you could make a case. But the Border Patrol apprehends and ICE deports hundreds of thousands.
The government is not held to a 100% effectiveness standard. Here’s what the gub’mint attorneys will argue:
In FY 2013:
“ICE conducted a total of 368,644 removals.
ICE conducted 133,551 removals of individuals apprehended in the interior of the U.S.
82 percent of all interior removals had been previously convicted of a crime.
ICE conducted 235,093 removals of individuals apprehended along our borders while attempting to unlawfully enter the U.S.
59 percent of all ICE removals, a total of 216,810, had been previously convicted of a crime.
ICE apprehended and removed 110,115 criminals removed from the interior of the U.S.
ICE removed 106,695 criminals apprehended at the border while attempting to unlawfully enter the U.S.
98 percent of all ICE FY 2013 removals, a total of 360,313, met one or more of ICE’s stated civil immigration enforcement priorities.
Of the 151,834 removals of individuals without a criminal conviction, 84 percent, or 128,398, were apprehended at the border while attempting to unlawfully enter the U.S. and 95 percent fell within one of ICE’s stated immigration enforcement priorities.
The leading countries of origin for those removed were Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador.”
One thing is for certain, no matter how this judge rules, the decision will be appealed.
In order to forward her case, Orly is going to have to prove that she contracted an illness directly from an illegal alien, and suffered a particularised injury. She has no such evidence, and needs to be aware that discovery is a two-way thing. The defence will be have access to all her client records, and I very much doubt Dr Taitz takes time out of her busy lawyering schedule in CA to see illegal aliens in her high priced dentistry practise. She has almost certainly lied in Federal Court and if she continues, it will not go well for her. She has also lied about her witnesses, who have not agreed to testify on her account.