Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brother Cracker

I have no problem with Orly Taitz as a person and I have no problem with her passions and motivations. It’s her approach that is flawed. Although she holds a law degree, it is from Taft Law School in California which is a correspondence course. And it is not ranked well.

So her problem is her legal training. She practices dentistry to pay her bills but her practice of law is reprehensible.

Law is hard. And to do it well usually requires requisite brilliance and experience.

I don’t believe Orly has the right training, contacts, time or experience to do law well.

But she has the right motives and intentions. And she files suits against Obama because she can. If she loses she has her dentistry practice to fall back on.

Why don’t brilliant, experienced lawyers take on Obama? Because law is their living. Most can’t afford to throw the dice.

So it leaves only a few lawyers with the means or the time to go to court against Obama. Taitz just isn’t up to the job unfortunately.

But the tables are turning. This judge gave her a chance, another swing at bat. If the judge is willing to do that, it sends a signal that the judiciary is ready to nail Obama if the right counselor can be engaged.


17 posted on 09/03/2014 11:31:44 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

agree with you 100%


18 posted on 09/03/2014 2:07:20 PM PDT by Brother Cracker (You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box then 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson