Skip to comments.
Cause of global warming hiatus found deep in the Atlantic Ocean
The University of Washington ^
| 8/21/2014
| Hannah Hickey
Posted on 08/22/2014 8:10:16 AM PDT by NowApproachingMidnight
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: bolobaby
Would conduction result in greater heat at depth then at the surface? I think not unless there is some form of forced convection.
Meanwhile, the SST in the Atlantic has been cooling of late.
I actually did better in Physics btw!
21
posted on
08/22/2014 8:48:24 AM PDT
by
Mouton
(The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
To: NowApproachingMidnight
...a puzzle for the climate science community. I was able to find a photo of one of their meetings;
22
posted on
08/22/2014 8:48:44 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(It is through will alone that I set my mind in motion.)
To: NowApproachingMidnight
Can’t get that link to work.
23
posted on
08/22/2014 8:58:27 AM PDT
by
Beowulf9
To: NowApproachingMidnight
The so-called global change experts don't have a clue how the oceans interact with our weather. That is true because they have no meaningful historical data regarding ocean temperatures and currents. The scant data they are collecting today barely scratches the surface (so to speak).
This announcement is an attempt to resurrect a dying theory by explaining away the inability of the theory to predict actual physical phenomenon. This is political activism, not science.
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
25
posted on
08/22/2014 9:04:18 AM PDT
by
bassmaner
(Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
To: NowApproachingMidnight
“Following rapid warming in the late 20th century,”
What rapid warming? The warming on the fictitous hockey graph?
26
posted on
08/22/2014 9:12:02 AM PDT
by
CSM
To: NowApproachingMidnight
A new horror movie. “It Came From Below The Sea”
27
posted on
08/22/2014 9:32:21 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: NowApproachingMidnight
It’s the insidious, nefarious, scandalous, bourgeois capitalists! Insidious and nefarious! Nefarious and insidious!
28
posted on
08/22/2014 9:35:31 AM PDT
by
Free Vulcan
(Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead...)
To: Mouton
Funny, I always thought hot fluids rise. Guess I need go back to chemistry class.Amazing isn't it.
To: NowApproachingMidnight
Adjust, adjust, adjust - that is what humans have done since they started walking the earth, and they’ve kept getting better at it and now have more means and technology for it than they’ve ever had, so my “climate” prediction is we will adjust to - mitigate the effects of - the climate at this time better than we ever have before. Global warming or not, humans are up to the challenge of dealing with it.
30
posted on
08/22/2014 9:53:16 AM PDT
by
Wuli
To: Dilbert San Diego
If the Neanderthals had SUVs and coal plants, that was no big deal. There weren't that many of them. And the pop growth didn't take off until the industrial revolution.
In 1800 there were less than a billion, now more than 7 billion, and 11 billion by 2100.
At some point, the number of humans becomes such a large force that it exceeds some or all the cyclic forces.
To: Senator_Blutarski
Exactly; and thank you for putting that so succinctly.
32
posted on
08/22/2014 10:20:27 AM PDT
by
mbj
(.)
To: bassmaner
The global warming movement /wants/ people to stop /trying/ to understand - and to simply place blind faith in whatever their theory du jour happens to be.
33
posted on
08/22/2014 10:22:16 AM PDT
by
mbj
(.)
To: Red Badger
Don’t you just love how they keep changing the model and reasons to match the current situation.
34
posted on
08/22/2014 10:24:23 AM PDT
by
Lockbox
To: NowApproachingMidnight
Yes, a natural occurring cycle. Sort of explains the ice age and jungles in the arctic.
To: bolobaby; Mouton; FreeReign; smokingfrog; NowApproachingMidnight
Not to validate their malarkey, but if you heat the surface of a liquid, conduction can transfer the heat to greater depths.Curious - would that conduction be due to ocean currents "pulling" the warmer water down?
36
posted on
08/22/2014 10:34:04 AM PDT
by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
To: Billthedrill
That’s the thing I keep coming back to. It’s the proverbial elephant in the room that these morons refuse to acknowledge.
Q: If your stupid models did not predict this and do not account for it, why the hell should anyone believe ANY of it is correct?
A: THEY SHOULDN’T!
37
posted on
08/22/2014 10:36:53 AM PDT
by
Lee'sGhost
("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
To: Lockbox
GIGO................Garbage In, Garbage Out..................
38
posted on
08/22/2014 10:40:57 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
To: NowApproachingMidnight
What a crock! These anti-science sellouts need to be badly beaten with their worthless dissertations.
39
posted on
08/22/2014 11:04:55 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: 4yearlurker
How could we possibly be discovering new facts about Global Warming? I thought the “science is settled!”
40
posted on
08/22/2014 11:08:01 AM PDT
by
JaguarXKE
(1973: Reporters investigate All the President's Men. 2013: Reporters ARE all the President's men d)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson