Replies

Finally, it’s all making sense now - one mean, likely stoned and dangerous wannabe gangsta thug setting conditions in Ferguson for his fellow thugs to emulate his actions by engaging violently upon the citizens and property of Ferguson in an unlawful rage of looting and destruction. If Michael Brown could have been there himself, he would have likely been leading these bullies, thugs and cowards.
And please, don’t try telling us that he was just a normal mischievous teenager having some fun on a weekend night. Michael Brown was a man who purposely set out to rob a store of a box of cigars to complement his marijuana usage, and then had the audacity and stupidity to strong arm and assault the store owner and continue to intimidate and threaten the owner before he defiantly marched down the middle of a street obstructing traffic and creating a danger to drivers and pedestrians. When confronted by a law enforcement officer he did not comply with a simple request and took it upon himself to, much like the store owner confront and strong arm a police officer, punching him in the face, reaching for the officers gun and attempting to wrest the firearm from the officer resulting in it accidentally discharging. He decided to then run from the officer and when asked to stop decided to ‘bum rush’ the officer who had absolutely no choice but to shoot not just once, but until this violent and menacing danger was stopped as he continued to charge the officer. And don’t try to say that he was unarmed, he was a 300 pound weapon himself who used his size and weight as a deadly weapon.
What was the purpose of publishing the name and address of a well-respected officer of the law if not to intimidate and frighten him and his family and put them in immediate danger and fear for their own lives.
Why are we lionizing Michael Brown as an innocent martyr, when in truth he was nothing more than a common thief and criminal, a danger to himself and to society.