Replies

An approximate transcription of the background conversation, as related by the “Conservative Treehouse” blog, who originally discovered the conversation:
@6:28/6:29 of video
#1 How’d he get from there to there?
#2 Because he ran, the police was still in the truck – cause he was like over the truck
{crosstalk}
#2 But him and the police was both in the truck, then he ran – the police got out and ran after him
{crosstalk}
#2 Then the next thing I know he doubled back toward him cus - the police had his gun drawn already on him –

[there is dispute here whether he says “doubled back” or “coming back.”]
#1. Oh, the police got his gun
#2 The police kept dumpin on him, and I’m thinking the police kept missing – he like – be like – but he kept coming toward him
{crosstalk}
#2 Police fired shots – the next thing I know – the police was missing
#1 The Police?
#2 The Police shot him
#1 Police?
#2 The next thing I know … I’m thinking … the dude started running … (garbled something about “he took it from him”)

This is terribly important because if Mike Brown had been shot, and he advanced towards the cop instead of surrendering, it would substantiate the narrative that the policeman shot in self-defense due to the fact that he was being threatened with severe bodily harm. This corroborates an account of the event given by a friend of Officer Darren Wilson:

Well, then Michael takes off and gets to be about 35 feet away. And, Darren’s first protocol is to pursue. So, he stands up and yells, “Freeze!” Michael and his friend turn around. And Michael taunts him… And then all the sudden he just started bumrushing him. He just started coming at him full speed. And, so he just started shooting. And, he just kept coming. And, so he really thinks he was on something.”

It’s far too unlikely that these two accounts are similar accidentally, having been from such disparate sources. The apparent witness in the background conversation is speaking with detail about the tragic shooting, and in a manner that runs contrary to the widespread version. Those who watch the video need to judge for themselves if the witness sounds reliable (but he would seemingly have nothing to gain by telling such a story.)

I heard a guy last night being interviewed - he said he can't confirm it, but he had heard from sources that the cop is still in the hospital with a broken eye socket. I'd heard previously, it was a broken nose. An Eye Socket Fracture (Fracture of the Orbit) is a very serious injury. It can cause double vision, decreased vision or blurry vision, and difficulty looking up, down, right or left. If MB was coming at him, the cop absolutely did not want to take another blow of any sort to the face with either that eye socket or broken nose injury and he knew if MB got to him, that was going to happen. If it was a fractured eye socket, the 4 shots that were off mass could have been because he wasn't seeing so well & as MB got closer, he was able to hit him with shots that stopped him. Frankly, if it was the eye socket injury, I would imagine the cop was fairly desperate to keep MB (all 300 lbs of 'gentle giant') off of him.

Exactly. This is unedited eyewitness account, yes hearsay, but these are people probably sympathetic to the mob rule in ferguson today. The media is so anti-black and afraid of that fact that they will sell their grandmothers to appear pro-black über alles.

A true unprejudiced opinion looks for facts and unmodified witness accounts like this, but racists stick to This Race (whichever) is Purely Angelic No Matter What, and That Race is Evil. It’s easy to sift out racism because they take clear sides on every incident. And our mass media is ANTI BLACK. No one could be so incredibly pro-black as they are without it being a major overcompensation.