So a journalist documenting police actions in a McDonalds is “abusing lawful authority” and a rogue in your weird little world? Got it.
The looters are wrong, and I’m all for application of Rule 308. But the cops can be wrong too, and were on the way they were treating journalists in the McDonalds.
And rouge is makeup, darlin’. Just for the record. I know it’s hard to do spelling when you’re all exciting and typing in all caps and such.
Comment from
http://politix.topix.com/story/13622-two-reporters-were-arrested-and-assaulted-by-ferguson-police
Comment
I am curious as to what the rest of the story is. I viewed the video, the officer was firm but subdued. He kept telling the reporter, “ Let’s go, let’s go.” The McDonald’s manager stood by calm, arms folded, observing. But he did not seem surprised or fearful. The reporter stated that several reporters had been using the McDonald’s for a “staging area,” using their electricity and WiFi. The restaurant is two blocks from the action so begs the question, “Did McDonald’s management ask police to remove the reporters?” The charges WERE trespassing. Why would police leave the riot zone to arrest the reporters? I am not saying this is the case, but it is certainly a consideration. The reporters claim they were “assaulted,” but neither reported any injuries. Generally if cops assault you, they hurt you. The “favor” was no formal charges. And resisting arrest can include passive resistance, eg. slow compliance. Cops in parallel military gear; there IS a riot going on.
Just an observation.