Where did this source get the information about one or two feet away? The NYT long article said there were no powder burns, but that the clothes were not tested and powder might be on them.
BTW, the NYT did break this story and reported fairly, I think, saying in the headline all shots were fired at the front of the body.
I also remember reading that there were no powder burns on Brown. In light of this report by the Pathologist I am wondering how was this possible?
A shooting that took place two feet away from the target would definetly leave powder as well as particles of metal from the cartridge case and bullet..
That material should be all over the clothes and skin.