Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry responds to indictment, calls it a political 'farce,' vows to defend himself
Fox ^ | August 16, 2014

Posted on 08/17/2014 12:48:27 PM PDT by Red Steel

Texas GOP Gov. Rick Perry responded Saturday to the weekend indictment in which he is accused of abusing his power of office, calling it a political “farce” and vowing to explore “every legal avenue” to combat the prosecution.

Perry, a 2012 GOP presidential candidate with potential 2016 aspirations, was indicted Friday for allegedly abusing his power by vowing to veto $7.5 million in state funds for an agency run by Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg, after she pleaded guilty to drunken driving in April 2013 and refused to resign.

Perry vetoed the money after Lehmberg, a Democrat, videotaped acting erratically during her arrest, refused to resign.

“I think Americans and Texans who have seen the video would agree that this is not the type of individual who should be heading up an office that we want to fund,” Perry said during a brief news conference in Texas. “I wholeheartedly and unequivocally stand behind my veto … I will explore every legal avenue to expedite this matter and bring it to a swift conclusion. I am confident ... this farce of a prosecution will be revealed for what it is.”

-snip-

“Rick Perry is a friend, he's a man of integrity,” said GOP Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who also appears to have 2016 White House aspirations. “I am proud to stand with Rick Perry. The Texas Constitution gives the governor the power to veto legislation. And a criminal indictment predicated on the exercise of his constitutional authority is, on its face, highly suspect.”

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: perry; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: drypowder
The Grand Jury apparently bears complicity as well.

Not as much as you might think. Remember, the Grand Jury sees only what the prosecutor wants them to see, hence the old adage about being able to indict a ham sandwich.

21 posted on 08/18/2014 5:13:09 AM PDT by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Because there is not any illegality. Everything and everyone is at risk to false charges and can be politicized by Democrats. To help explain and quote a couple of candid Dems in rare occasions from years gone by: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." and "We just make sh*&#t up" as we go along.

Stalinists lie. ALWAYS

22 posted on 08/18/2014 2:35:23 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (ISIS has started up a slave trade in Iraq. Mission accomplshed, Barack, Mission accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson