Some Demographic Data:
* Religious people marry earlier and have more kids.
* The 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) reported that women who say religion is “very important” in their everyday life have both higher fertility and higher intended fertility than those who say religion is “somewhat important” or “not important.”
* The report Sustainable Demographic Dividend shows that overall and especially in the United States, religious people have more kids than secular people.
* In the 53 rich countries they surveyed, religious people have a 2.21 birthrate, while secular people have a birthrate of 1.69 not enough to replace themselves.
That’s why they’re importing 20 million more voters.
Like what..."I can see Russia from my house."?
Abortion
Contraceptives for all
People and their endeavors (coal, oil, pollution, large scale agriculture that prevents starvation, etc,) are destroying the Earth and must be stopped.
No wonder they don't have many children.
Hispanics are reproducing lots faster than whites are, maybe the author counts them as religious conservatives.
If we are going to have abortion, it should be 100% Federal Government subsidized for registered Democrats.
No Federal or state subsidies for Republicans who want an abortion.
Okay article, but I hope the author was using the term “breeding” as a jocularity. Human beings don’t breed. Even reporduction is an unfortunate term as every soul is unique. We procreate, cooperating with God who is The Creator.
An L Stanton Evans article was discussed by Mark Levin about a year and half ago. The that article stated, that Left is De-populating itself, and the America’s new Immigrants ( mainly Hispanic ) have all the social-conservative DNA to potentially vote with us if we ask them to adopt Reagan’s Shinning City on the Hill, if you will especially if we explain it or teach it too him. You can’t believe how many Freeper’s have handed me my arse for thinking like that or mentioning this. Stupid is as Stupid does, especially the E-GOP for not taking Mr. Evan’s proposition seriously...
Look at China as an example of a nation where government controls population growth. They will be suffering from that misguided policy for generations. However, that glaring example won’t deter our own central planners, who think they know how to run a nation better than God.
Whatta laff.
Too late the Libs figure out that they are simply extincting themselves.
Oh Well. The fertility clinic doc will deliver the bad news: sorry, no more eggs Ma’am, yer too old. “Forever Young” was just a song. Biology is less forgiving...
We are doing the best we can to help, 3 daughters and two sons. Would have done better but mama got sick and can’t have anymore. Praise God she is still here and the children are turning out great. I personally know of many families who are filling up the pews in their local churches.
Shock: 80% of U.S. population growth is from immigrants, resources being sucked dry
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3187028/posts
Have you seen that sci-fi movie, Children of Men?
Movie trailer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VT2apoX90o
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children_of_Men
Children of Men is a 2006 science fiction film directed and co-written by Alfonso Cuarón. The screenplay, based on P. D. Jamess 1992 novel of the same name, was credited to five writers, with Clive Owen making uncredited contributions. The film takes place in 2027, where two decades of human infertility have left society on the brink of collapse.
Did you know that the USAs fertility rate is 1.89 (2011) which is less than the minimum replacement level of 2.1?
I find it amazing that a sci-fi movie is coming true not because of nature causing women to lose the ability to have children, but because women are choosing to just not have children.
I do not believe this article because we have been seeing this effect for almost 40 years Post-Roe yet Millenials are the most liberal generation ever tracked. The author seems to ignore almost 40% of births are out of wedlock.
Ah, those breeder conservative Christians!
(as seen by progressives)
I believe the flaw in this thesis is that while white well-off progressives themselves aren’t reproducing, they are importing lots of non-white poor folks who are doing a fine job of increasing the number of Democrat voters.
Robin Williams: Children are ‘The Thing That Makes Life Worth Living’
http://news.yahoo.com/video/robin-williams-children-thing-makes-021840185.html
Not to mention the abortion industry which snuffs the lives of babies who would grow into democrat voters at a much, much higher rate than future conservatives.
A couple of points:
1. The left REALLY believes in this overpopulation crap. It’s what underlies their entire worldview. That’s why abortion and homosexuality are non-negotiables for them. Abortion snuffs a life, of course, but homosexuality can’t reproduce and it abbreviates the life they have left. They’re a twofer!
2. The author fails to recognize that the media and academia both serve up the leftist swill, causing many children to reject the faith of their fathers. Hedonism and irresponsibility appeal to kids who aren’t truly saved before they leave home.
Liberals control academia. They don’t have to have children....they can grab your children. They start the indoctrination at an early age. That’s how they create more liberals.