Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HammerT

The only reason he got shot is because Reagans people refused to listen to the secret service and allowed psychos like Hinkley to stand 15 feet away as they were exiting the hotel. That’s close enough where Hinkley could have used a flame thrower if he wanted. Guns had nothing to do with it. Hinkley also got within one foot of Carter when he was POTUS. What does it matter if he uses a gun? He could have used any other method and still caused massive damage. He could have set off a bomb, would the gun opponents have preferred that?


6 posted on 08/05/2014 6:43:26 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Hitlery: Incarnation of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GrandJediMasterYoda

I remember the panic at the ABC news desk that day! When it was mentioned that the gun had been bought in Dallas, news anchor Frank Reynolds threw his hands in the air and yelled..”AGH! DALLAS!”

To a Dem lib, Dallas was still a cursed city because of Nov 22, 1963.


15 posted on 08/05/2014 6:53:17 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need more than seven rounds, Much more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Well even now with the diseases we’re blindly letting into the country, he could just coughed or shook his hand to do the deed.

Just sayin..


17 posted on 08/05/2014 6:55:23 AM PDT by HammerT (The Right to keep and bear arms: A Commonsense Civil Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson