Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cotton1706

I must say, this is a strange approach to winning due to fraud.

I find it hard to believe that statistics and not outright identification of sham votes/voters will suffice.

Hopefully, the description provided is too abbreviated.


9 posted on 08/04/2014 2:51:17 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind

It’s hard for them to prove it with votes because the courts won’t let them see the books.


27 posted on 08/04/2014 3:13:15 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

They were denied access to the majority of the voter books they needed to prove their case outright.


54 posted on 08/04/2014 4:24:00 PM PDT by Ingtar (The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson