Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H
You conceded that my view is consistent with that of the framers of the 14th

No. In saying "framers" you're not distinguishing between DRAFTERS (Bingham and Howard) who wanted to add the Corfeld rights and whose whose intent is irrelevant and the RATIFIERS whose intent is the dispositive intent in construing the 14A.

90 posted on 08/08/2014 3:14:15 PM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate over unjust law & government in the forum of ideas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: PapaNew
Here you go =>

_______________________________________________________________

2. It's fair to say my position prevailed on original intent. You conceded that my view is consistent with that of the drafters of the 14th, while yours is not. You also failed to provide any evidence that the ratifiers agreed with your position or disagreed with mine. The fact remains that they knew the intent of its drafters and voted in favor of it.

________________________________________________________________

91 posted on 08/08/2014 3:26:13 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson