Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1rudeboy

Russia had a status of forces agreement with old Ukraine that permitted 20-25K of its troops to be deployed in Crimea. Those levels were never exceeded during the time period leading up to the reincorporation of the Crimean peninsula by Russia.

Kerry-hawks can whine about ‘little green men’ all they’d like, but the fact is the Russians were deployed in Crimea in compliance with an existing SOF.


20 posted on 08/04/2014 11:40:09 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: mac_truck
Right. And Putin admitted that he sent forces not governed by the agreement.

Nice evening on Red Square?

21 posted on 08/04/2014 11:41:30 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: mac_truck

Russian forces were supposed to stay in their base and not enact taking over a territory from Ukraine.

You try to bring the word “Kerry” here, but the whole world has been pretty clear about the events in Crimea. In the UN vote your corner had ONLY these 11 countries:

Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Cuba, North Korea, Zimbabwe, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Nicaragua and Bolivia.

No one else.


22 posted on 08/04/2014 11:49:13 AM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson