Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EQAndyBuzz

“Tell me what his high crime is and I will tell you if he should be impeached.”

At least you answered the question. Now ... if you don’t believe he has committed high crimes then why were you OK with impeaching him after the election? If one doesn’t believe he has committed crimes then they shouldn’t support impeachment at all... period. The reverse is also true. If one truly believes he has committed crimes then they should support immediate impeachment. Anything else is just playing political games.

Only reason I dialogue with you at all is I find it interesting to try and understand how people think ... or not .. when it comes to this topic.


52 posted on 08/04/2014 6:30:47 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk

“Only reason I dialogue with you at all is I find it interesting to try and understand how people think ... or not .. when it comes to this topic.”

Why wouldn’t I answer the question? There isnt one person on this forum who doesn’t want to see Obama impeached. Sounds like you are looking for justification for calling congress back and impeaching him tomorrow morning and anyone who doesn’t agree with you are, what did you say? Oh yes, Weenies.

Everyone on this forum wants Obama impeached tomorrow morning. And if you asked everyone on this forum, if Republicans get control of the senate should they do a Harry Reid, go nuclear and demand Obamas removal from office? Some would say yes to that also. The ones who would say no, would say no because the Constitution doesn’t provide for that.

The reality however is it will not get done tomorrow. It will not get done in September. There is a right thing to do and a politically expedient thing to do and politicians aren’t touching this till after the election because that is the politically expedient thing for them to do,especially in an election year. Is it right? No.

Hopefully that answers your question. With that said, when you choose to call someone a name rather than have a clean debate based on the facts, we have a name for that person. They are called a liberal. And that was exactly what you demonstrated on this thread by your remarks to me. And that “Only reason I dialogue with you” comment up top it the icing on the cake.


53 posted on 08/04/2014 6:59:49 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (GM is dead and Al Queada is alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson