Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Jonathan Turley is a liberal, but he has shown that he is no fan of Obama's abuse of Presidential power. His is a good discussion of how impeachment works, how it's not supposed to work and its limitations as a part of the political process. As he points out, impeachment is not about justice for criminal acts, it is a political remedy with some serious limitation. He does not mention the most important, the need for 67 votes in the Senate to remove a President from office. For that reason alone, impeachment will never happen with this President.
1 posted on 08/04/2014 8:37:39 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: centurion316
the need for 67 votes in the Senate to remove a President from office. For that reason alone, impeachment will never happen with this President.

Impeachment does not mean removal from office. It means being brought to "trial" for consideration of removal.

Bill Clinton was impeached. He was not removed from office.

The senate votes are not a limitation to impeachment, rather a limitation on the ability to remove from office, after impeachment.

2 posted on 08/04/2014 8:44:09 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

impeachment = charged

it does not mean convicted


3 posted on 08/04/2014 8:46:35 AM PDT by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

The primary value of any impeachment action by the House of Representatives would be to highlight this lawless President’s illegal actions in a public forum that would get a lot of media attention. Unfortunately, the media would make every effort to paint the current occupant of the Whitehouse as a victim hateful racial bias.


4 posted on 08/04/2014 8:51:35 AM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

"Is freedom anything else than the right to live as we wish?
Nothing else."

~Epictetus




God bless this site, this Free Republic.
Please click the pic


6 posted on 08/04/2014 8:52:16 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Senate removal is independent and irrelevant. Obama’s actions warrant impeachment - multiple times! Obama deserves the distinction of being the first president impeached TWICE!


7 posted on 08/04/2014 8:52:28 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Documentation File on the 2014 Impeachment of B. Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro a former Foreign Student from Indonesia, and still a legal Citizen of the Sovereign Nation of Indonesia.


9 posted on 08/04/2014 8:56:30 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316
Jonathan Turley is a liberal,

Jonathan Turley is a lawyer. He favors making it easier to sue the Executive Branch. He would benefit financially if the laws allowing such lawsuits were to be liberalized. Impeachment doesn't offer any financial benefits for him.

13 posted on 08/04/2014 9:01:39 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

The Republican “leadership” in DC is running away from impeachment as quickly as they can; frightened to death that the DIMS/MSM will call them names and fund-raise off of it.

As we sit here, the DIMS/MSM are calling the Republicans names and fund-raising off of the impeachment narrative they created.


14 posted on 08/04/2014 9:06:03 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Impeachment is a process. It may or may not lead to removal; it won’t lead to removal today. However, it might some time in the future. Whether it does or not is dependent on how well a case is made pre-impeachment (discussion going on now), and the case made during impeachment. There may come a point where impeachment is the last option to save a Republic, or even worse, waiting even longer where even impeachment won’t save it.


15 posted on 08/04/2014 9:07:34 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316; All
Thank you for referencing that article centurion316. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

I basically stopped reading Mr. Turley's article after reading his first myth refuting the idea that everything is impeachable. No, not everything is impeachable. The problem is that, as a consequence of Mr. Turley probably not understanding the federal government's constitutionally limited powers, particularly Section 8 of Article I, he is essentially clueless about Obama's constitutionally indefensible actions.

18 posted on 08/04/2014 9:09:13 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Clearly Impeachable Offenses are not merely what Congress defines them as such.

Equally clearly, Obama has violated his oath of office in refusing to defend our borders, in refusing to enforce laws, in unconstitutionally changing laws, and in providing aid and comfort to the enemies of America.

If this bastard can’t be impeached, NOBODY can


20 posted on 08/04/2014 9:17:57 AM PDT by ZULU (Go REDSKINS!!! Impeach Obamar in 2015 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

As the democrats control the Senate, impeachment would only be a symbolic gesture by the House.

However, the House has the power to defund everything Obama. Boehner refuses to use the only real power he has. This silly lawsuit that the House is trying is an embarssment that emphasizes how spineless Boehner is.


25 posted on 08/04/2014 10:21:07 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Turley notes that impeachable offenses include behavior such as continuing unconstitutional abuses even after the courts have ruled against them. Somehow he misses that Boehner’s lawsuit is aimed at exactly that. They need to hurry it along, and add more cases.


29 posted on 08/04/2014 10:29:10 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

New tagline ...


33 posted on 08/04/2014 10:44:10 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Impeach. Rinse. Repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

In practice, impeaching and convicting a president means shame and humiliation for the impeached president. Politicians don’t like to do that to other politicians. For one thing, it sets a precedent that can be used to unseat a president of their own party. The impeachment process is also likely to be considered partisan and a waste of time by much of the public. So in practice, an impeachable offense does have to be something very like an actual crime, even if the Founders didn’t intend it to be.


44 posted on 08/04/2014 3:30:44 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson